Skip to main content

Inspection - Part of Quality Assurance or Control Quality?

One of my student posted this question today on Udemy "Pass PMP in 21 Days"

And It made me think that quality, out of all the knowledge area is the one, in which we think, we know but end up with wrong answers.

For instance  - This question:

Is inspection as a tool part of QC (Quality Control) Or a QA (Quality Assurance) Process?

Here is the answer which I posted - 

"Inspection is relevant in both Quality Assurance and Quality Control. I do understand that this is the most confusing aspect of quality management. However just keep in mind that inspection process happens in Quality Assurance (Also referred as Audit) and understand since this is part of executing process group, the deliverables are under progress (Direct and Manage project work). So Quality assurance focuses on process inspection in order to PREVENT defects.

Quality control is part of monitoring and Controlling process group. This is assumed that deliverables by the execution team is finished and now those deliverables needs to be tested before they can be produced for sign offs (to internal or external clients). (Check the ITTO of this process)

So in QC (or Control Quality) the inspection take place on completed deliverables. 

What does this imply? It imply that you need to refer to the question context and need to understand as the scenario represent preventive checks or corrective checks (as part of inspection), and then only select the right option.



I hope - you, who are reading this get a clarity on QA and QC process after reading the post..

Please leave your comments here, and I'll get back to you.

Popular posts from this blog

Risk and Risk response questions in PMP and RMP

Here is another question posted by one of the participant:



Hi Kavita... one more query...regarding Risk Response Plan. If I find a risk of missing deadline...and to avoid that I work extra time or hire few temp contractors to complete the work within deadline. So is this case of AVOID risk or ACCEPT risk? I did avoided the risk by adding more time/resources. However I also accepted that risk will occur and hence hired more people. From what I understand is ACCEPT is you don't take any action and wait for the risk to happen and use contingency plan. So in that case I accepted risk and my contingency plan was to hire more people. But at the same time AVOID risk says, take action and eliminate risk. So I eliminated risk by hiring people. just too much confusion :)
So what is the answer to above question?This is what I posted back..
A risk has some probability and some impact - I'm sure you know that.. Now lets understand the risk responses in detail: Accept - Do Nothing Avoid - Sele…

Critical Path Method (CPM) Simplified..

A critical path is the longest path in the network.  Each node which falls under critical path has zero or negative float (Slack).
Now how do we calculate critical path?? I’ve seen various illustrations having different way to calculate CPM, few are:
-The project starts on day 1. -The project starts on day 0.
Both the approaches give same results, however I liked the day 0 approach better, its simpler, easy and lesser room for errors.
Example
 There are 3 steps to calculate CPM: 1. Forward Pass - To calculate the Early Start(ES) and Early Finish(EF) of node. 2. Backward Pass - To calculate Late Start (LS) and Late Finish(LF) of node. 3. Calculate Float and Thus CPM.
The Forward Pass: We start from first Node or Start node. The works begin on day 0. 
We’ll fill up information in highlighted boxes:
In forward pass, we calculate the Early Start and early finish date of activities.
Node A: The activity starts on day zero, since A activity duration is for 5 days, the early finish…